Pajama Pundits

Iran resumes uranium conversion

Having thumbed its collective, governmental nose at Franco-Germanic offers to supply their country with processed uranium for power production, Iran demonstrated what most other nations on Earth tend to when it becomes convenient: If the UN gets in your way, ignore it.

Resuming pre-processing conversion of uranium ore into gas, Iran broke UN seals on a facility that can begin the process for creating weapons grade (or, it must be admitted, power reactor grade) fissionable material.

The IAEA, (International Atomic Energy Agency; the UN's nuclear cops)

debated how to strongly rebuke Iran

It is devastaging sociopolitical blows like that which are at the root of the UN's staggering power to do absolutely nothing in world affairs.

Matthew Boland, a spokesman for the U.S. mission to the IAEA, described the breaking of the seals as "yet another sign of Iran's disregard for international concerns."

What is sort of interesting, at least as far as this article is concerned, is this bit:

"The IAEA said in a letter to us today that it gives (the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran) permission to remove the seals and fully restart activities at the facility," Mohammad Saeedi, Iran's deputy nuclear chief, told state-run television Wednesday.

I'd be interested in hearing more about that letter.

More from Boland:

"We strongly support (Germany, Britain and France's) efforts to convince Iran to stop its dangerous activities," he said.

Okay, but Iran already refused the previous deal, and unfortunately, the world knows pretty well by now just how far the UN is willing to go. Governments tend not to be impressed by the UN's appeasement, and they aren't scared of its peacekeeping forces.

Is it a press to get a better deal from the Euros? Or is it just what the Iranians say it is, in which case, people should consider being more than just 'officially concerned'.

UPDATE: The IAEA isn't just 'officially concerned', they're 'seriously concerned'. I'm sure that makes all the difference in the world.

Does Iran have a point?

Or: Why would 'I have my ball, and I say no one else should get one' work as a global policy?

The Iranians did, obliquely, bring up a point that has interested me for many years now.

But Iran's chief IAEA delegate, Sirus Nasseri, argued earlier that all countries should be permitted to produce their own nuclear power plant fuel to prevent being "dependent on an exclusive cartel of nuclear fuel suppliers — a cartel that has a manifest record of denials and restrictions for political and commercial reasons."

Laying aside the irony (Iran is a member of OPEC) one is moved to wonder how it came about that nuclear capable countries played such a big role in helping decide that no one else should become so.

Then again, at some point, one has to deal with the irony...

Schroeder warns against force

Or: Isn't waggling my finger and saying 'Bad, bad boy!' good enough?

What does it take to convince some people that merely saying 'We are gravely concerned', just isn't going to worry some people?

German Chancellor Schroeder took exception, today, to President Bush saying that no options were off the table when considering Iran's possible violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Schroeder said Germany's allies in Europe and the United States must maintain a strong position while negotiating with Iran over its nuclear program.

"But take the military options off of the table; we have seen that they're not suitable,"

... perhaps someone should remind Chancellor Schroeder how much good political sanctions accomplished in Iraq over 14 years.

Mind you, I think no one should be in any hurry to even begin serious consideration of applying military force in Iran*, but if you promise to leave all your face cards out of the deck before you sit down to a game of international poker, you might be lucky to come home wearing a barrel.

(show)

Iran will not back down on uranium

In a move that surprises absolutely no one, Iran's leader Khamenei says his country will not stop enriching uranium. Ostensibly, the purpose behind snubbing the UN and earlier agreements to suspend operations at the enrichment plant is to prevent 'becoming dependent' on western uranium sources to keep Iranian power plants operating.

TEHRAN, Iran - Iran does not intend to build nuclear weapons, but it will continue to enrich uranium because it does not want to be dependent on others for its nuclear fuel needs, the country's supreme ruler said Friday.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei told tens of thousands of worshippers at Tehran University that Western allegations his country is secretly trying to make weapons are "a propaganda trick to deceive their own public opinion."

Were that the sum of the information, it would be an open question as to whether or not the UN and/or other nations could, or even should, do any more than watch. There is, however, more to the story.

Iran is building secret nuclear components, says rebel group

Ian Traynor Friday August 19, 2005 The Guardian

Iranian opposition activists said yesterday that Tehran was rushing to build nuclear components in breach of its commitments to the UN.

The National Council of Resistance of Iran, the political wing of the outlawed Mujahideen-e-Khalq guerrilla movement, which is classified as a terrorist organisation in Europe and the US, said the Iranian authorities were covertly building and concealing thousands of centrifuge rigs used to enrich uranium for nuclear fuel or weapons.

Admittedly, this is from the Guardian, and I have some reservations about their credibility. Also, as the article points out, the NCRI is listed as a 'terrorist group' both in the US and elsewhere. Too, the NCRI has apparently said lots of things about Iran and its nuclear policies/capabilities...
but some of those things have been confirmed.

... three years ago it [NCRI] was the first to disclose secret Iranian centrifuge operations in Natanz. Those allegations turned out to be largely true and triggered the international crisis over Iran's nuclear activities that has been running for two years.

Having perhaps learned something from Saddam Hussein's 12 year long shell game with UN inspectors... we have this:

As far as the UN inspectors are aware, the Iranians have less than 200 assembled centrifuges at Natanz.
but we also have this:
In London yesterday the Iranian activists said Tehran has been fooling the UN and the EU by secretly constructing some 4,000 centrifuges while pursuing negotiations.

The centrifuges were said to be hidden at military and Iranian revolutionary guard facilities, off limits to the UN.

Earlier this month a senior Iranian nuclear negotiator, Hosein Mousavian, said on television that Tehran had exploited the two years of negotiations with the EU to refine some of its nuclear activities at Natanz and the uranium conversion centre at Isfahan.

Not to worry, the UN watchdogs are on the job, hurrying to allay suspicion.

VIENNA (AFP) - The UN nuclear agency has concluded that highly enriched uranium particles found in Iran were from imported equipment and not from Iran's own activities, diplomats said.

As always, the devil is in the details.

But the diplomat said the results of tests on cases of low enriched uranium (LEU) contamination, which is below weapons-grade and are also being examined by the IAEA, were "murky" and that the "LEU issue will probably never be solved."

Another diplomat said the inability to resolve the LEU question meant that the investigation's results "don't prove Iran's story is true. They prove it is plausible."

Too, the IAEA (the UN's Atomic Energy group) isn't quite willing to say,,, well,,, anything substantive.

IAEA chief Mohamed ElBarradei said on August 11 that while "all declared (nuclear) material in Iran is under verifiction . . . we still are not in a position to say that there is no undeclared materials or activities in Iran."

... I wonder if ElBarradei is familiar with the word 'duh'?

Other sources note that Iran apparently feels like it's holding a very good hand in this latest round of thermonuclear poker.

For their part, Iran's leaders seem to sense their advantages. In recent weeks, they have made clear they believe they have plenty of leverage and are less vulnerable to economic pressures from the outside. The country's new, hard-line president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, recently said "no economic or political incentive can dissuade us from getting peaceful nuclear energy."

A State Department official said the Bush administration has noted Iran's "new defiance" but believes it is symptomatic of "a new overconfidence by the Iranian regime in its level of international support."

I wonder if [German Chancellor] Schroeder, trying to make sure the Iranians believe no one is really serious about the whole idea, has anything to do with that?

A diplomatic effort to contain Iran's nuclear program — led by Britain, Germany and France and supported by the U.S. — hit a serious snag two weeks ago, when Iran rejected a package of political and economic incentives offered in return for abandoning its nuclear-enrichment program. Iran then resumed work at a uranium-conversion plant in Isfahan — a step that could assist in making nuclear weapons, though Iran says it seeks only civilian nuclear power.

One suspects that 'hit a serious snag' is world-government-speak for Iran telling the Euros, in almost exactly so many words, to stuff their proposal.