Pajama Pundits

Friday, September 30, 2005

History as a judge

Or: When so few real facts get into the knowledge stream in the first place, how does one judge?

It occurs to me that the changing face of 'reporting' events has the potential for much further-reaching effects than people might think.

It is easy to say that 'history will be the ultimate judge' as to whether or not a specific scenario was handled adequately, but that depends on history being able to judge the scenario dispassionately. This presupposes that history will have, as the bench from which judgement comes, the real facts of the case.

I am not sure it is any longer a given that history will be allowed the opportunity to judge some things dispassionately, the real facts of many current events may well be forever lost down the memory hole.

Update: I don't always like Kathleen Parker's perspective, but this one is spot on.

Green on Delay

Donna's favourite blogger has a question for you... (don't worry, it's multiple choice and you can use your notes)

(Updated to fix a formatting mistake I'd made. Sorry)

Wednesday, September 28, 2005

Rather and Mapes stick to their fabrications

Or: When you know you've done something really, really stupid, pretend it's everyone else who doesn't get it.

Dan Rather is still trying to figure out how bloggers mamaged to see through his story, (From Radio Blogger via lgf)
More to the point, he's still trying to divert attention from the real facts of the scenario.

It’s absolutely amazing to me that any rational human being could still give this paranoid, pathetic man credence when he claims the Bush Guard memos have not been proven to be fakes, and suggests that the blogosphere’s exposure of the fraud was some kind of sinister plot.

Still, Rather, sort of, ish, a little, maybe, accepts that there might be a teeny, tiny bit of what might, potentially, be considered 'journalism' in the blogs.

Some blogging, I think we would be guilty of over-generalizing...some blogging strikes me as at least a possible new form of journalism. Now in my own mind, and I'm not trying to get everybody else to do this, if the blogger is prepared to put his or her name on it, and be accountable for what they put on the blog, then it is a stretch, it would be a stretch for me, but keep in mind, I'm 73, soon to be 74 years old, and yesterday's man. In a stretch, I could see a person who wants to give information, wants to be an honest broker of information about the who, what, when, where, why of events, and attaches his name to it, that might be a new form of journalism. I'm not there yet, but it could be.

I know you weren't talking about me, Dan, but I'm almost, possibly, perhaps, maybe, thinking about potentially saying thank you on behalf of the sphere.
... ish.

Not to be outdone, Mary Mapes is still, very carefully, shocked, mostly, it seems, because bloggers were concentrating on the fact that the 'memos' she'd 'uncovered' were blatantly fake, instead of looking at the message those fake documents held.

Our work was being compared to that of Jayson Blair, the discredited New York Times reporter who had fabricated and plagiarized stories.

Hey, this isn't fair. At least Jayson Blair didn't fabricate actual evidence. And of course, given that they're "hard-core, politically angry, hyperconservatives," there's no need to pay any attention to what they say, right, even if they are smart lawyers, and that in the case of Charles Johnson, proprieter of Little Green Footballs and web site designer, he has forgotten more about typography than Mary is ever likely to learn or (on the available evidence) be able to comprehend?

My favourite bit is this one:

There was no analysis of what the documents actually said, no work done to look at the content, no comparison with the official record, no phone calls made to check the facts of the story...

Well, she's finally admitting it.

Oh, wait! She's talking about the bloggers! My irony meter just shattered the glass, and bent its needle into a pretzel.


Thanks to Transterrestrial Musings (again, via lgf) for that one.

... the more things change.

Update: From the comments section at the lgf piece, a very good point.

In response to Dan's comment regarding the lowering (can it get much lower?) 'esteem' in which modern 'journalists' are held, we get this:

I guess the "kind of esteem" that Dorothy and company had for the Wizard of OZ went down when Toto pulled the curtain back. The truth is though, that the Wizard never did deserve it; he just bluffed his way into acquiring it. As did Rather. Until Charles and other participants in the blogosphere pulled his curtain back. The difference is that the Wizard knew when the jig was up. [emphasis added]
... that's gonna leave a mark.

Update again: Korlapundit has a kit you can use to create your own TANG memos!

Bush considers military 'first responders'

From the 'Damned if you do...' files.

In the aftermath of Hurricane Rita, it is once again shown that, no matter what he does, the press will complain that President Bush did it wrong. Bush ponders military response

Still, this is supposed to be less about the AP's glaringly evident bias against the President, and more about irony.
Given the numbers of people who are complaining about the Federal response to Katrina, and given the investigative committee which seems quite ready to crucify Brown for the entire episode; one would think a plan to have the military become a first-response group...

U.S. President George W. Bush said on Sunday that Congress ought to consider giving the U.S. military the lead role in responding to natural disasters, as he heard one general describe the Hurricane Katrina rescue effort as a "train wreck."

in bigger natural disasters would be a slam-dunk.

One would, apparently, be wrong.

Louisiana Sen. Mary Landrieu (news, bio, voting record), a Democrat, expressed reticence about that approach on CNN's "Late Edition."

Landrieu said the military has a strong role to play "but so do our governors and our local elected officials." [emphasis added]

Senator Landrieu is going to have a tough time selling that idea to Blanco and Nagin, I think.

... sometimes, all one can do is shake one's head in wonder.

Tuesday, September 27, 2005

Lynching party convenes

From the 'Okay, bring the guilty b*st*rd in and we'll hang him after a fair trial!' files.

No one with a shred of intellectual honesty would attempt to deny that pretty much everyone with responsibility to the people affected by Katrina failed to one extent or another. Brown bears his share, and Congress, in typical fashion, looks to be about to hang him for what's his and scapegoat him for the rest.

Brown is standing up and refusing to accept public crucifixion for things he shouldn't have had to do.
... unfortunately, it won't do him any good.

Committee Chairman Tom Davis, R-Va., cautioned against too narrowly assigning blame. "At the end of the day, I suspect that we'll find that government at all levels failed," Davis said.

He pushed Brown on what he and his agency should have done to evacuate New Orleans, restore order and improve communication.

"Those are not FEMA roles," Brown said. "FEMA doesn't evacuate communities. FEMA does not do law enforcement. FEMA does not do communications."

Ohh, the old 'that's not what we're supposed to do' gambit, it is, Mr. Brown? Just because it's not something your agency is supposed to handle, do NOT think you can escape being pilloried for not handling it anyway!
Doesn't Mr. Brown understand that, regardless his agency's actual mission, people believe it should be all-encompassing, and therefore, he can and will be taken to task for not doing it all, immediately? (we'll leave the debate over 'federal intrusion in state affairs' arguments for another time)

In the end, it seems as if, between Congress and the media, the vast majority of everything that can't be stuck on President Bush, will be hung on Brown.

The two scenarios I, in my cynical mood, see resulting from this are:
a) having smeared Bush and scapegoated Brown, assigning blame to them for,,, well, everything, none of the core failures will be addressed, leaving 'business as usual' just that and setting the Big Easy up for a repeat performance the next time a big storm wanders in.
b) just as bad, 'the people' will come to the conclusion that Uncle is supposed to fix everything, all the time, and Uncle will try to comply.

... but I might be a cynic today.

Shameless props to Iowahawk

For no other reason than because it's funny!

Letter from Al

al-Qaida leader killed

Or: Another one bites the dust.

From the 'couldn't happen to a nicer guy' files. Al Qaida #2 killed.

BAGHDAD, Iraq - U.S. and Iraqi authorities said Tuesday their forces had killed the No. 2 official in the al-Qaida in Iraq organization in a weekend raid in Baghdad, claiming to have struck a "painful blow" to the country's most feared insurgent group.

Now, I know this is the AP, so it's only 'claiming' right now, (unless, of course, it's AL Q doing the 'claiming, in which case 'we' take it as gospel) and I also know I probably shouldn't applaud the fact that a human being has lost his life, but you'll have to do a lot of work to convince me that the world isn't a better place for this.

Update: It seems the news is even better than a first glance showed. (that'll teach me to post before reading the whole article (suuuuure it will))

Abu Azzam's death was followed by two other successes against al-Qaida in Iraq's leadership, officials said — the group's leader in the northern city of Mosul surrendered to the Iraqi military, and its leader in the town of Karabila in the sensitive region near the Syrian border was killed.

You see, it's not just that progress is being made, significant to this bit is just who is making the progress. Despite the best efforts of the MSM to show otherwise, it would seem that Coalition training efforts are having a positive effect, and that Iraqi forces are actually taking on some of the burden themselves. It's a good day!

Monday, September 26, 2005

Sheehan arrested

Or: Momma moonbat gets an early Christmas present.

It all unfolded exactly as planned. A self-serving publicity hound set out to get arrested and got her wish. After being told several times to move on, people who broke the law got arrested... and I'm sure the President will get all the 'bad press' from the scenario. I'd quote in the relevant text, but it's couched in too much glorification for my tastes. If you want to read what little there is about it, go here.

Sheehan is a lost soul who is disgracing the memory of her son for her own selfish reasons. That's all I'm going to say on the subject.

UPDATE (by Donna B.) - The photo of the arrest.

"Oink Oink," said the Louisiana delegation

The Washington Post headline is - Louisiana Goes After Federal Billions. What the article doesn't make clear is that it's really hard to tell just how many of the billions the Louisiana delegation (led by Senator Mary Landrieu) is really going after.

After reading parts of the text (pdf, html) and the entire summary (pdf) of S.1765 on Landrieu's site, it is apparent that the summary is misleading and I have to wonder whether that is purposeful. There's little doubt in my mind that the average citizen is going to opt for the 9 page summary over the 440 page text of the bill.

If there hadn't been so many glaring omissions of $ amounts in the summary, it's not likely I would have started digging into the full text either. I'm not a masochist!

Neither am I enamored with the idea of the federal government writing Louisiana a blank check.

The total of all the items in the summary with a $ amount listed in the summary is $241.2 billion. That's a little shy of the Washington Post's estimate of $250 million, which I'm beginning to think may also be an underestimate.

This is the summary of Subtitle A--Department of Defense--Military:

• $743 million for Defense Operation and Maintenance expenses incurred during relief efforts.
• $547 million for the Department of Defense to procure needed equipment.
• Two year increase in the Family Separation Allowance to from $250 to $350, effective 29 August 2005.
• Ensures that all deployments in support of Hurricane Katrina relief efforts shall be credited towards the “mobilization” requirement in the six year deployment cycle policy of the Army National Guard, Air National Guard, and Army Reserve.
• $748 Million for Defense reconstruction of military facilities and family housing in Louisiana.
• $160,000,000 of the Military Construction fund will be directed to the City of New Orleans to implement the proposed “Federal City” initiative.

First, using the amounts listed in the full text, I come up with $762.5 million for the first item.

Add to that the $82.5 million in the full text for the Family Separation allowance and we've got a little over $2.3 billion in this section alone.

But wait! There's more. The summary doesn't include the part about the Navy turning over to either the City of New Orleans or the Port of New Orleans "...all right, title and interest of the U.S. in and to a parcel of real property, including any improvements and facilities thereon, consisting of all acreage at the Naval Support Activity (east bank of the Mississippi)... for the purpose of facilitating the development and expansion of the City or Port Authority."

Even after the damage Katrina caused, this property is bound to have some value. If it's part of the "Federal City" plan, was the plan to turn it over to New Orleans before Katrina hit? It appears that several items besides the $160 million specifically designated to New Orleans for the "Federal City" are designed to facilitate or enhance that project, which was supposed to cost the feds $0 and Louisiana $200 million. Is the state of Louisiana still planning to contribute $200 million to the project?

There's little doubt the military is running up some bills doing law enforcement, search and rescue, and numerous other tasks, and I generally have little problem with funding for the military. In this instance, it appears that the Louisiana delegation is attempting to enhance its existing agreements with the military and possibly grab a few military goodies they didn't already have.

With that, I've got a problem. This is a reconstruction bill, not a new construction bill.

Granted, I'm griping about a measly $2+ billion, a mere drop in the bucket. That's only because I haven't got around to reading the rest of the full text of the bill yet.

UPDATE: Ann Althouse says it's not unlike the way the flood set off looting.

Sunday, September 25, 2005

Dead Tree Blogging

(Transcribed from notes made while reading the latest Scientific American and S.1765 by generator-powered lamp.)

Damn... the Japanese, the U.S., and the European Union are trying to dig a hole to China. That had to be as irresistable to write as all the pithy observations about the spiciness of Louisiana politics.

What the ship Chikyu is designed for is drilling through the earth's crust to the mantle and extracting samples.

This amazing ship carries a drill pipe that is 9.5 kilometers long -- 22 times the height of the Empire State Building and it cost only $540 million to build. For perspective, that's just a little over 2% of what Louisiana's Congressmen and Senators want to rebuild after Katrina, none of which could possibly be called pork, right?

Saturday, September 24, 2005

On Bigotry and Iraq

Or: Everyone is equal, but some ideas are just too radical!

A case can be argued that at least some of the anti-war sentiment is based in bigotry, acknowledged or not. There is precedent for the premise; witness Captain Ed being villified for having the audacity to call someone 'articulate'. (how dare he?) It would seem that one gets to assign motivations to another's commentary/positionality.

Okay, I just will then.

It suddenly dawned on me that there may be something behind war protestors' positionality: particularly regarding how 'we' are apparently supposed to take it as a given that the religious fundamentalism of certain foreign sociopolitical entities is not subject to change; specifically: that efforts to introduce democratic governmental organization in the MidEast are doomed to failure, because 'it won't work there'.

... why not?

Is the argument that religious belief is not to be opposed? Or is the argument that religious belief is only not to be opposed when it forms a framework upon which government in some areas operates?

Consider:

'Here', religious belief in all aspects, (even,,, almost particularly, personal conviction, regardless its application, or not, outside the sphere of purely personal action/interaction) is fairly vigorously deprecated by the 'enlightened', nowhere more so than when it serves as an anchor point for a moral compass.
More correctly, 'here at home', religious belief is tolerated, barely, when it goes absolutely no further than the worship-house door on (insert your favourite day here). Once the weekly ordeal has been endured,,, and photographed, (publicity gambits are publicity gambits: all's fair in love and politicking) it must be put away, never to be allowed to affect one's 'public' existence, lest one be considered, somehow, anachronistic. The implication is, evidently, that 'we' are somehow 'above' all that.

'There', however, theocratic sociopolitical foundations are to be left alone, regardless the radical fundamentalist aspect of any one, because 'it's just not going to change'.

The implication 'there' would seem to be that 'they' are somehow not 'above all that'.
Which could lead one to think that perhaps, just perhaps, those ever-so-enlightened ones aren't quite as thoroughly 'embracing diversity' as they want everyone to believe.
"Everybody is human, and 'humanity' is 'advanced' enough that 'we' find it reasonable to expect them all to throw off the yoke of organized religion. However, those poor, unfortunate, downtrodden Middle Eastern Islamics are not going to change their ways, they aren't 'advanced' enough to embrace democracy and 'we' shouldn't try to introduce it."

... but I bet if I said that was bigoted, they'd get mad at me, too.

Paying people to stay in the path of a storm?

Tyler Cowen at Marginal Revolution suggests a Swiftian solution to gridlocked evacuations, such as the recent one from Houston:

Pay people who stay behind. By the day, of course. And only if they own cars.

Just in case his tongue wasn't firmly planted in his cheek, I've got to post disagreement. In last week's evacuation, most people thought it was worth the cost to evacuate. Staying behind is almost always cheaper (barring loss of life).

The truly Swiftian way to handle it would be to make evacuation even more expensive. The gridlock sort of did that, didn't it? Next time a hurricane is headed toward Houston, that will be remembered and more people will choose to stay behind.

It's more a pendulum of experience. New Orleans is primed to over-react to the next hurricane threat and Houston is primed to under-react. Enough experiences (like Florida has had) will eventually lead to a moderate, more efficient response.

On a slightly different tangent to the cost of evacuating, those who end up in shelters need to be treated just a little less like victim royalty. While I've heard (all my life) of the Red Cross not accounting for how it uses its funds well enough, what I've not heard about is an evaluation of its theories on how shelter residents are treated.

While residents are relegated to waiting and hours of boredom, volunteers (or paid staff) rush around making coffee, serving food, and cleaning up. Wouldn't the residents be happier and less demoralized if they were doing more of these things for themselves?

I understand that some things (food preparation and storage involving raw ingredients, for example) must be more closely controlled than others. I do not understand what appears to be an encouragement of helplessness, resulting in a more demoralizing experience than necessary.

Thunderstorm Rita has arrived

It's loud and sounds scary. High level winds are much stronger than on the ground, which explains all the "tree trash" on our lawn.

We've experienced flickering and intermittent power outages. Our backyard puddle is full, but the rain has been steady, not a strong downpour, so it's not threatening the laundry room.

From the weather satellite photos, it looks this may be as bad as it gets. Let's hope so. It would be so nice if the winds did not topple trees on power lines.

The outermost bands of Rita

At 10:20 pm, I thought I heard thunder. I'm not sure... if it is, it's far off, but it's also "rolling" thunder. (It could be B-52s, I suppose.) The tops of the trees are swaying quite a bit and I can hear the wind in them. At ground level, the breeze is perfect for gentle flag fluttering.

These photos were taken about four hours ago near the intersection of I-20 and I-220 on the west side of Shreveport:

Looking to the south...

Looking to the north...

Satellite photo was taken about 2 hours before my sky photos...

Shelters here are not wanting more evacuees. Though the Shreveport Times reports that the shelter at CenturyTel center in Bossier City was supposed to reopen at 3:00 pm, at 7:00 pm highway signs still advised that local shelters were full.

(Hey, it could have been even more out of focus!) Shelters are apparently available in some of surrounding rural areas.

The Times is also advising local residents to get prepared by having three to four days of food, water and batteries on hand.

We've got all that, a generator and 10 gallons of gas, plus a spare pair of clean pajamas. I've never tried running my computer off the generator before. Don't you think a Pajama Pundit should have a laptop? (There's a Christmas hint for ya!) Not that it would matter... what are the odds the cable would be working?

In the 15 years I've lived in this house, we've had numerous power outages, most of them due to ice storms and lasting three or four days. One lasted seven. The city water service and natural gas have never been interrupted, and I don't expect them to be this time either.

Flooding will not be a problem. This house is at least 10 feet higher than our neighbor's and his isn't going to flood either.

I do expect to be without power. No one familiar with the area will bet against my assertion this neighborhood will be one of the first to go dark and the last to get power restored. Swepco's got a legacy to live up to.

UPDATE: 3:00 am - It's raining now, just a drizzle and the winds have lessened, if changed at all.

Friday, September 23, 2005

Beatty on the Governator

Or: It's only okay when I do it!

One for the 'You've GOT to be kidding!' files Warren Beatty dares to complain about someone else's public image.

OAKLAND, Calif. - Actor Warren Beatty leveled a blistering political assault on Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger on Thursday night, accusing him of governing "by show, by spin, by cosmetics and photos ops."

"Mr. Pot, Mr. Pot, there's a Mr. Kettle on the line for you, something about your appearance."

In the sort of reply that one wishes would get used a lot more often, the Governator's office had this:

Schwarzenegger spokeswoman Margita Thompson said "we don't care that much about Warren Beatty, and based on his ticket sales from the past generation, I doubt anyone else does either."

ROFL!

Wednesday, September 21, 2005

About those photos of Hurricane Katrina your cousin Bill emailed

The photographer that actually took them asks that you slap cousin Bill for him. Well, slap him only if cousin Bill claims the photographer is anybody other than Mike Hollingshead.

Coin IA, August 26, 2004 Alvo Nebraska, June 13, 2004 Highway 12 Nebraska, May 28 2004 Crofton NE, August 16, 2002 S. Sioux City NE, May 9, 2004 Alvo Nebraska, June 13, 2004 Chester NE, May 24, 2004 Highway 12 Nebraska, May 28 2004 Central Nebraska, July 12 2004

The one thing the emails have right is that the photos are amazing. That's all the more reason the photographer should get the credit! He's bemused that so many want to claim they took them.

What they honestly get out of that and how it makes their daily lives better I don't know.

They're jealous, maybe?

If the html works like I want it to, you should be able to see when and where each photo was taken by holding your mouse over it. Click on it and the link should take you to the Mike Hollingshead page where the photo can be found. Take some time to explore Extreme Instability. I'll never think of the midwest as "boring" again! He's got great photos of his cat and dog too.

Snopes has more on the history of these "all-purpose storm photos".

The Cloud Appreciation Society is stunned and amazed that no one else has pointed out that one of photos is an eerie likeness of Margaret Thatcher.

Who's interested in school spankings?

And why?

In this old post of mine, Talking out of school, I reminisce about getting a spanking on the first day of school. Almost everyday since then, I've got at least one hit on that post from a Google search for "spanking".

I suspect a lot of those Googlers are disappointed by my post. A lot of them are not from the U.S. either.

So far today, it's been viewed three times, from Poland, Malaysia, and Norway.

UPDATE: (7:38 pm) Indianapolis

UPDATE II: add Canada.

Just wondering... should I reopen comments on that post?

Honore For Governor

And let this be his campaign slogan:

(via Ace of Spades)

UPDATE: Video here.

UPDATE II: Of course I was laughing when I typed the title to this post, but it's not that bad an idea. Gen. Honore is capable, competent, organized, honest, respected by those who work with him... all perfect opposites of the Louisiana politician. (There may be exceptions. Please put examples in the comments!)

There is a Recall Kathleen Blanco site up. I've requested a petition to sign. Even if ultimately unsuccessful, I think this is a worthwhile effort for at least two reasons:

1. Louisianans have accepted that political corruption is a way of life here. Maybe we have some variation of Stockholm Syndrome.

2. Such a petition could serve as a sort of wake-up call for other public servants in the state, all the way down to dogcatcher. They'd likely hit the snooze button, but with the voters having set the alarm, it's unlikely all of them would toss the clock out the window.

In California, prior to the successful recall of Gov. Gray Davis, only four of more than 107 recall efforts since 1911 qualified for the ballot. We've got to start somewhere.

Another thing we can do is tell our lawmakers we'd like to be able to recall them a little more easily. Of course, they're not going to like that idea, but they might throw a bone or two our way. Mostly Cajun sums up what it currently takes to recall an elected official here:

...the state legislature provided that a recall election requires a petition with hand-written signatures of a THIRD of registered voters, with a separate petition filed in each of Louisiana’s 64 parishes (counties) within 180 days of the filing of the original petition of recall.

I don't know if the statute has been refined by court decisions, but it could use some clarification. At first, it doesn't appear that a petition must be filed in each parish, as the "voting area" for governor is the entire state. Then again, it later says that "The signed and dated petition shall be submitted to the registrar of voters for each parish within the voting area..." Does this mean a third of voters in each parish must sign or that if a third statewide sign, that at least one signature in each parish is required?

The least the legislators could do is clear up what they mean.

The applicable code is here: Louisiana Revised Statutes Title 18. Louisiana Election Code, Chapter 6-C. Recall Elections, § 1300.2. Petition for recall election; campaign finance disclosure.

UPDATE III: There's now another website devoted to the recall of Gov. Blanco - R.E.C.A.L.L.

Sunday, September 18, 2005

Schroeder gone?

Or: He can still play piano for Lucy, right?

I don't want to get caught in a 'Dewey Defeats Truman' sort of net, but it's looking like Germany is no longer content to simply sit and complain about things in the US, while the situation at home worsens.

The vote centered on different visions of Germany's role in the world and how to fix its sputtering economy. Schroeder touted the country's role as a European leader and counterbalance to America, while Merkel pledged to reform the moribund economy and repair ties with Washington.

Who'd a thunk it?

Saturday, September 17, 2005

Winners and Losers

Winners:

Pundita - all the Katrina/Louisiana politics posts, which are mostly about losers. (via Riehl World View)

Donna Brazile (via Wizbang, and Ace of Spades, who is cynical. Maybe he's right, but I'm optimistic.)

Bobby Bright, Mayor of Montgomery, Alabama (via Alphecca)

Losers:

Cindy Sheehan (via Ace of Spades & Confederate Yankee, who knows a machine gun nest when he sees one.)

Chai Vang (via Althouse)

Louis Farrakhan (via Classical Values)

Joseph Cannon (via Right Wing News)

Venezuelan humor

Or: How to be really silly in the worldwide media without even trying.

It seems Hugo Chavez thinks the US plans to invade his country.

Chavez, interviewed on ABC's "Nightline," said the plan is called "Balboa" and involves aircraft carriers and planes. A transcript of the interview was made available by "Nightline."

The part I found particularly amusing is this bit:

He added: "We are coming up with the counter-Balboa plan. That is to say if the government of the United States attempts to commit the foolhardy enterprise of attacking us, it would be embarked on a 100-year war. We are prepared."

It would be the most 25-minute '100-year war' anyone had seen. Still, Chavez was nice enough to take time out of his comedy routine to pitch in a comment for the 'Duh' files...

In the event of a U.S. invasion, Chavez said the United States can "just forget" about receiving any more oil from his country

I'll have to thank him, later.

Friday, September 16, 2005

A Pack, Not A Herd

Instapundit links to this article, Katrina, What Went Right. The author, Lou Dolinar, sums up the rescue successes of at least four different organizations with helicopters saying:

Individual federal and state units were not coordinating their efforts overall. There was no central clearing house for information on rescue efforts. What looked like a hurricane relief breakdown was in fact a press release breakdown.

And then he notes:

Local rescue efforts by boat were surprisingly robust, contrary to conventional wisdom. The much maligned New Orleans police and fire departments, which began operations Monday afternoon, were able to field 100 to 200 boats in the first 24 hours after the breach, according to local officials quoted in the Times Picayune. However, with the City's communications system broken down, the 500 to 1000 rescue workers had to organize themselves and so were operating without central command and control, thus also below the media radar.

Isn't that an example of the Pack, Not a Herd idea, even if the packs are police and military units?

I suggest that an attempt to "coordinate" these groups would have slowed the response by some of them by at least 24 hours and, additionally, could have made each individual rescue use more resources and take longer.

Hopefully, whatever commission investigates the various government responses, will consider that possibility.

Tuesday, September 13, 2005

Katrina Observations

I've not posted much on the hurricane and its aftermath. It didn't take me long to get thoroughly disgusted with the pandering of faux outrage by the newspeople who obviously had no clue about much of anything.

To illustrate: the CNN reporter in Pass Christian, Mississippi kept calling it Christian Pass. The name didn't fit her perception of what she thought it should be, so she just changed it. I had trouble believing anything she said.

Then, I was ashamed of my fellow Louisianans, especially our politicians. It's bad enough to be corrupt, but to be stupidly incompetent on top of that... how embarrassing. Does any else think it's time to recall Blanco?

About those school buses... was the school board included in the disaster plan? Though Nagin surely should have utilized the city buses where I have no doubt of his authority, it seems to me that the New Orleans school board (another corrupt entity) should have helped in providing drivers. It would not surprise me to find out that someone in the school district is as responsible as Nagin for the buses remaining parked.

Corporate America is responding admirably, I think.

The racism accusations sicken me. Imagine if Nagin had been white. Why am I not hearing accusations of racism against Blanco? Why only Bush and the federal government? Mostly, none of the accusations make much sense. The problem is culture, not race.

For some thought-provoking reading on the culture of poverty, read Asymmetical Information, specifically: The poor really are different and Perish the poor.

I'm not saying FEMA deserves no criticism, but it seems to me that it is getting criticized unfairly. For example, I don't think their response was all that slow. But shouldn't they be criticized a lot more for costly creative experimentation? The cruise ship idea may end up being a real good one, but I don't see it yet. And the $2000 "credit" card was just a really, really bad idea, compounded by initially incomplete news reports that had people at all the shelters thinking they were going to get one.

The good news locally is that 75% of the Red Cross shelter residents in the Shreveport-Bossier area have found more permanent housing. The bad news is those remaining are people with fewer options.

Sunday, September 11, 2005

Four Years Ago

At this time four years ago, I sat, stood, paced the living room near the television set, trying to focus on the photos and read the scrolling updates through seemingly endless tears... tears which return uncontrollably at the memory.

The Jawa Report has a caption contest with no winners today. It's fitting, because remembering what we felt, what we thought that day is a testament to who we are and what is important to us.

I'd just returned from a vacation and I was asleep. Sometime before 10 am (CDT), the phone rang. It was my sister in the UK. She answered my hello with "What the hell's going on there?" I said tentatively, "um... nothing I know of." She told me to turn on the television.

How long we talked, I don't remember. We were on the phone when the first photos of the south tower getting hit were shown. We were still connected when the Pentagon was hit, when the news of the crash of Flight 93 was aired, when the towers collapsed.

We correctly surmised that Flight 93 was an intentional crash (sis is a pilot and air traffic controller). That day, today, and for the rest of my life, the Americans who fought back on that plane are my biggest heroes.

We decided that the President was likely headed for Barksdale AFB. I found it somewhat disturbing that we so easily narrowed his possible destinations down to three, with our first choice being the one he used. It shouldn't be that easy to figure out.

I was home alone, my husband working out of town and my children grown and on their own. I wanted to talk to them. I told my sister we'd talk more later. I could not control the tears... how many of you know that many women express anger with tears as well as sadness?

My youngest was in school at W&M. She reported that many of her classmates were from the DC area and worried about parents who worked in or near the Pentagon. My oldest, four months out of the Army was talking about re-enlisting, but anxious because she hadn't been able to contact her husband who was still active duty.

He was in his car in a part of the country where cell phones didn't work, listening to tapes, and, for a short time, blissfully unaware of how his country had changed.

My son in Michigan was, like me, glued to a television set.

My husband and his co-workers were getting sketchy reports from family members like me calling them with the news.

What I felt was a need to be close to my family and an ever increasing anger that anyone would... could do such horrible things. It was five days before I felt fear. Five days of silence. We live under the approach path for the regional airport. The silence was deafening.

On Sunday, I heard aircraft, but not the ones I was used to hearing. Not the ones I now realized I liked hearing. These weren't commercial. These weren't Barksdale's B52s, which are a fairly common sight. Fighters in the sky above my house? Despite all the talk on TV, it took seeing T38s to make me realize that my country was preparing to go to war and to shatter the surreal bubble of denial I'd been in.

A forceful response was necessary. Flowers, memorials, waving the flag, and mourning the dead would not suffice. Symbolism would not suffice.

It was suddenly obvious from the beginning that this was an attack on the world, on Western Civilization, on progress, on modernization, on capitalism. On Freedom.

Naively, because of the demonstrations of caring, support, and solidarity I was seeing on TV, I thought the rest of the world realized this too. After all, hadn't innocent citizens of almost every country in the world died that day?

Wouldn't the world react in large just like I was reacting individually? Wouldn't sadness, anger, and fear turn to steely resolve to rid the planet of this cultural pus?

In the past four years, my naivete has melted somewhat. I'm still an optimist. I still think good will triumph over evil in the end. The fear is gone, the sadness, anger, and resolve remain.

Tuesday, September 6, 2005

UN Needs Reform

From the 'Duh!' files...

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The United Nations urgently needs stronger leadership and wide-ranging reforms to prevent the "illicit, unethical and corrupt behavior" uncovered in the $64 billion oil-for-food program for Iraq, a year-long inquiry found.

Imagine my surprise. The story so far.

Never fear, ask any moonbat and you'll find out that George suborned the probe.

UPDATE: The surprises keep coming.

UNITED NATIONS - A probe of the Iraq oil-for-food program faults U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, the Security Council and some United Nations member states for "egregious lapses" that allowed corruption and incompetence to cripple the operation, according to a preface of the final conclusions.

Is it any wonder that Iran, and a dismayingly large number of other countries, thumb their noses at the organization? This bit will cause widespread panic:

The preface of the report makes four broad recommendations:

_Create the position of a chief executive officer, to ensure hiring decisions are based on talent rather than "political convenience."

... there goes the neighborhood.

Sunday, September 4, 2005

Payback Time

Or: You can't count on anyone but yourself, but sometimes, people surprise you.

I already know better than to think this will stop any of those 'what have they done for me lately' moonbats, but if you do want to know what 'they' have done for us lately... try this.

Thank you!