Pajama Pundits

Thursday, December 30, 2004

Link-O-Rama

Stricken by laziness and a complete lack of inspiration, I offer the hard work and inspiring thoughts of others:

First up, I just have to say "see you next year!" to Jay Tea. I can't help it... childish perversity is one of my better qualities.

Next, a proposal (modest, of course) from American Digest: A Sabbatical year for the United States.

Then there's this excellent advice and how-to on New Year's Resolutions from Michele.

Army of Mom is, tragically, naming names.

Roger L. Simon checks out the library.

Blackfive graphically warns of the dangers of drinking too much.

Dan, the Carnivorous Conservative (soon to be something else) gets into Drunk Dog Blogging.

An Asymmetrical lesson on headline writing.

Dave confirms it. He is a raging internet junkie.

LaShawn Barber notes a change in status.

Beth doesn't get it. Neither do I.

Carnival of Fun With Food (more commonly known as recipes.)

Wednesday, December 29, 2004

A Litmus Test for Logical and Practical Rights

Jay Tea at Wizbang posts:

...if you simply remove the means that people use to be bad, they'll stop being bad.

Of course. And there are SO many tools to use to be bad. I'm using one of them now, as Ace reminds us:

The legacy media hasn't quite called for legislation banning bloggers yet, although CBSNews (who else?) has fretted about that "blogs are providing a new and unregulated medium for politically motivated attacks" -- the implication being, of course, that perhaps this whole First Amendment thing is a bit overrated, at least as applies to non-credentialed reporters

Jay Tea again:

Got a problem with people shooting each other? Presume that everyone who has a gun is just one bad day from going postal, and toss up all the roadblocks you can to keep the guns out of everyone's hands.

Aw shucks. So much for the 1st (a nice-sized chunk of it anyway) and 2nd Amendment. I'm not too worried about the 3rd... yet.

Jay Tea's jumping off point is a quote from a radio talk show about airport security screenings and profiling passengers: "They're looking for bombs. I want them looking for bombers." He lands squarely on: 

He was dead right, and he summed up one of the biggest problems liberals have today. They believe that if you simply remove the means that people use to be bad, they'll stop being bad.

I would substitute "we" or "the U.S.A." for "liberals" and in all fairness, he does go on to say that conservatives are just as bad, except on different subjects. It's a problem of logic and practicality, not one of political ideology. Whether the nominal topic is guns, airport security, terrorism, drug laws, child molesters, the issue behind all of them is the balancing of risk and security with the Constitution.

Though I griped about airline security measures before 9/11, they didn't bother me quite as much because the people doing the searches weren't employees of the federal government. I figure the airlines have just as much right to try to control what is carried on their planes as I do to try to control what is brought into my house. (And I decided to ignore the public ownership of airspace...) For the most part, the searches weren't based on sex, race, creed... except for that one little old (and I do mean old) lady who never failed to have men remove some item of clothing at our local airport.

But now, the security personnel work for the federal government and there's that pesky 4th Amendment:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Personally, I think that's a major problem for security searches mandated by federal law and performed by federal personnel. Fitting a profile is not enough, there must also be a warrant and it needs to be specific. I've heard that excuse that no one has a right to fly, so it doesn't infringe on anything... but frankly, that excuse has a bit of problem lifting off the runway. Now I'm not so willing to ignore that the airspace is publicly owned, or the public funding of airports and the FAA.

What we don't have a right to is perfect and complete safety. We have the right to strive for it until our efforts butt heads with other rights. All the enumerated rights are subject to this limitation. For example, the clause in the 1st Amendment that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or the prohibiting the free exercise thereof" is the source of a lot of bickering on the part of the ACLU and its opponents. But I have never heard of anyone suggesting that any religion has a 1st Amendment right to encourage or compel its followers to openly and actively seek the death of those of another faith.

Yet... I keep reading that certain Islamic sects do just that. So my suggestion is that we simply issue arrest warrants for followers of those sects. Sure, all they've got to do is lie and say "I'm a Catholic" or something... and sure, it sounds like an old-fashioned inquisition, but it is not. The arrest warrant is for people who have threatened the death of others, it's for people who threaten to prohibit the free exercise of every other religion but theirs.

No, I don't think that's going to happen, but somewhere, somehow we are going to have to do something about those who spout hate in the name of religion. We don't fall for it when the KKK does it, why do we fall for it when those with the same mindset within Islam do it? I also keep hearing that most followers of Islam are peaceful and follow a religion of peace. It is up to those peaceful people to shout down the KKK-type loonies in their midst.

Cheese and Crackers and Tsunami Videos

An impressive collection of videos on the tsunami disaster is at Cheese and Crackers.

(But wait, there's more! Along with the videos you get much more amusing tidbits of traffic and link envy from a fat kid and the Ace of Spades than you're getting here. No, silly... not more envy... more amusement!)

Tuesday, December 28, 2004

American Red Cross Disaster Relief

I've added a link to the right for donations through Amazon.com to the Red Cross Disaster Relief Fund. As of this post, the total collected is $936,050.26. That's a lot, but it's not nearly enough. This disaster is so widespread, so devastating, that it will take years for some areas to recover. The need isn't going to go away after the victims get a change of clothes and a meal or two.

UPDATE: 5:50 am CST - $1,005,479.99
UPDATE: 12/30/2004 - 4:10 pm CST - $5,765,220.75
UPDATE: 12/31/2004 - 7:00 pm CST - $10,009,722.00

Details from American Red Cross: 

At least 50,000 people have lost their lives in East Africa and South Asia in the aftermath of the earthquake and resulting tsunamis on December 26. Thousands in Sri Lanka, India, Somalia, Sumatra, Thailand, and Indonesia are still missing; many others have lost their homes and livelihoods. Sri Lankan and Indian coastal regions were the hardest hit, with over 20,000 people killed, but Indonesia, Seychelles, Maldives, and Thailand were all affected by the tsunami waves, which reached as high as 20 feet. Aid workers and volunteers are focused on stopping the spread of disease and delivering food and drinking water to survivors. The American Red Cross reports that emergency assessment and first-aid teams were on the ground quickly and are already working with local groups to support relief efforts. Your financial donation will help provide medicine, clothing, food, and shelter for victims of the East Africa and South Asia earthquake and tsunami disaster. Thanks in advance for your participation during this critical time.The American Red Cross name is used with its permission. For more information about the American Red Cross, please call 1‑800 HELP NOW or email info@usa.redcross.org.

Zea Iz Zo Zorry!

These people know how to apologize! Unlike these.

Wicked Good® Christmas Present

These slippers are so comfy and warm, what more could a pajama blogger have wanted for Christmas? They feel so good, I don't even want to take them off to go to bed! My offspring never fail to find the perfect gift for every occasion. They have blessed me with trips overseas, with scrapbooks of our lives, with perfectly planned evenings on the town, with unexpected "I love you" cards on otherwise ordinary days... and always with love.

But they wouldn't let me wear these when we went out to eat...

Buy them here.

Monday, December 27, 2004

9.0 Magnitude Earthquake in Indian Ocean

UPDATE 01/10/2005 - Wizbang: Tsunami Video from Aceh, Indonesia

UPDATE 01/07/2005 - Wizbang's Tsunami Video Archive, Chrenkoff's Friday tsunami update

UPDATE: 01/05/2005 - Images from NASA's Earth Observatory, via My Vast Right Wing Conspiracy

UPDATE: 01/04/2005 - Chrenkoff's tsusnami news update, The Moderate Voice tells of Heroic Elephants

UPDATES: 01/01/2005 - Very interesting reporting from India Uncut, a blog by Amit Varma, with pieces on disaster management, best intentions, the most affected, identity, VIPs, medical and psychological problems... and more. Just keep reading, but be warned that the writer isn't into euphemisms. (link via Instapundit)

Buy South Asian! NZ Bear is compiling a list of products we can buy from the affected areas. Since I'm going to be buying coffee anyway...

UPDATE 12/31/2004 - Videos: at Cheese and Crackers and Wizbang here, here, and here.

UPDATE 12/29/2004: The South-East Asia Earthquake and Tsunami - SEA-EAT has an incredible amount of information. Go there and to The Command Post

A short note to anyone of whatever political persuasion who thinks this event and its aftermath are opportunities: Please go sit in the corner quietly while concerned, competent, and compassionate people do what must be done.

For a comprehensive roundup of news and relief efforts, The Command Post. For photos, Yahoo.

UPDATES, ANALYSES, BACKGROUND INFORMATION, etc. (added throughout yesterday and today):
Classical Values: On the Slopes of Vesuvius, God didn't do it (And nature sometimes sucks)
Washington Post: When Disaster Strikes
USGS: Current Earthquakes: World
Belmont Club: The First Drops of Rain, The Wavefront of Death
Daniel W. Drezner: Unfortunately, This Qualifies as a "Mind-Blowing" Event
New Blog Devoted to this disaster (via Instapundit): The South-East Asia Earthquake and Tsunami
Screenshots... Jeff Ooi: Donations and Aid - Think Global
Wikipedia (via Jeff Ooi): 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake

The enormity of this tragedy... is overwhelming. The death toll continues to climb .

Scott at Speed of Thought covers the science
Tim Blair covers those that don't get the science and the whiners.
Wizbang has video. (I had to switch from Firefox to IE to watch it)
Washington Times: U.N. official slams U.S. as 'stingy' over aid (Ace has an opinion about that U.N. official)
Michelle Malkin: A Hat Tip to Aaron Wildavsky
Powerline: Asian Tsunami Toll Rising, A Different Kind of Anti-Israeli Homicide?, The Blame Game, and How to Help
The Moderate Voice: Tidal Wave Warning That never Came: Was It Like the Mayor in "Jaws?", Asian Blogs' Accounts

Swarming an opinion storm

I agree with sisu. And if I were smart, I'd end this post now.

However...

I also agree with the venerable Instapundit and the conspiratorial Jim Lindgren.

Furthermore, I'm not that smart and I'm not as talented or as nice as any of the above, so I'll probably not be able to express my dismay with Hugh Hewitt's MSM wardrobe questions or with what sounds to me like chronic carping on MSM bias against Christians without sounding anti-Christian. And I do not want to sound that way because I am not anti-Christian.

It's just that sometimes, some Christians seem to be so... anti-anything-but-fundamentalist-Christian.

For credibility in Mr. Hewitt's eyes, do I, blogger, need to answer the same questions he asks of MSM writers? Will my criticisms of his conclusions carry more weight if those answers meet with his approval? Do I get extra credit for writing in pajamas?

Let's see...

Who did I vote for for president in the past five elections?
2004 - no one (my husband was going to vote for Kerry, ended up out of state and unable to vote so we agreed that I would not cast my vote for Bush. No vote fraud in this household!)
2000 - Bush (cancelled by my husband's vote for Gore)
1996 - Dole (cancelled by my husband's vote for Clinton)
1992 - Clinton (12 years ago, my husband and I agreed on something...)
1988 - Bush (I hadn't met my husband yet.)

Do I attend church regularly and if so, in which denomination?
No. I'm wondering why he doesn't want to know why not, and which denominations are approved or unapproved.

Do I believe that the late-term abortion procedure known as partial birth abortion should be legal?
Yes. I protest that question because it is crafted to put proponents of its legality into a box marked heathen and to elevate its opponents to the position of righteous defender of the sanctity of life.

Do I believe same sex marriage ought to be legal?
No. I wonder if Mr. Hewitt is interested in why I think it should not be legal, much as I wonder if he is interested in knowing why I think abortion should. I wonder if he thinks any of these questions - even the seemingly simple who-did-I-vote-for questions - have simple answers?

Do I support the invasion of Iraq?
Yes.

Do I support drilling in ANWR?
Yes.

These were presented as 10 questions. Unless I've grossly misunderstood what I've read on Hugh Hewitt's blog over the past 3 months, I think he would be in agreement with me on my simple answers to 7 of them. Is that a passing score?

He says:

If I know the answers to those ten questions, I can quickly decide what degree of trust with which to approach a reporter's reporting. Even "low trust" reporters can earn trust, of course, but degrees of suspicion are a fact of life. Only MSM pretends otherwise, and bloggers have exposed that pretension as the fiction it really is, even if most of MSM want to continue the charade.

Does that mean he would trust 70% of what I write without question? I certainly hope not. Though apparently I also agree with him on 70% of these issues, I disagree with far more than 30% of at least two of his recent posts.

If I've learned anything in my life, it is to question everything, especially that which I think I know. I can be persuaded by reasonable, sensible, and factual arguments to modify my positions on the last five questions.    

After having read Evolution Shares a Desk With 'Intelligent Design' and Hewitt's very selectively presented evidence that Washington Post writer Michael Powell is an agenda-driven and shoddy journalist bent on marginalizing people of faith, I find Hewitt's commentary just as agenda-driven, his fact-checking equally shoddy, and thus, must question the credibility of his conclusion.

Could the WAPO article have been written better? Yes. Could Hewitt have objected that two paragraphs within the article were unfavorable to people of faith? Yes. However, it's not the two paragraphs he chose to cite. (Paragraphs 2, 14, and 18 are much worse.) One of the paragraphs Hewitt quotes is the motion passed by the Dover school board. His main objection to the other one seems to be the use of non-specific words like "several" instead of "two or three". His other objection is that Powell did not fact-check one of the men he quoted:

Several board members resigned in protest. When the remaining board members chose replacements, they subjected certain candidates to withering questions. 'I was asked if I was a liberal or conservative, and if I was a child abuser,' recalled Rehm, who was known as an outspoken opponent of intelligent design."

Observations (Hewitt): How many is "several?" Did any member of the school board confirm Rehm's account of his interview or dispute it? Is the "child abuser" question the routine question now asked of millions of workers with children as a protection against liability flowing from abuse cases?

I was unable to ascertain whether two or three board members ultimately resigned because of the motion, after following all the links provided that didn't require payment. I'll take Hewitt's word on that, though he is mistaken as to the number reported by Powell as replacements. Hewitt says three, but the article describes four (without naming all of them).                        

Hewitt did not note it, there were 13 people interviewed for the positions nor did he suggest that Powell should haved asked any of them about the content of their interview, which would have been appropriate and informative. Hewitt later links to a York Dispatch article (not free) from which he quotes verification of the liberal/conservative question, but not the child abuse question.

Hewitt continues:

Since the article is supposed to be about a school board's plunge into a controversial borderland between science and faith, nothing would be more indicative of the board's intentions than a detailed report on who was selected to replaced the resigning protesting board members.

Are quotes from the school board members when the plunge was taken not indicative of that? Why no grousing about the statements attributed to the curriculum chairman, William Buckingham? Does the statement of the board's legal representative describing the board's overall mission as defending "the religious freedom of Christians" have no bearing on that? Why not just state religious freedom... why limit it to Christians?

One such appointee is mentioned --John Rowand, identified only as an Assemblies of God pastor. If all three appointees were pastors who believed in the literal interpretation of Scripture, that would tell the reader one thing. If the other two appointees are simply community and school activists with long records of service, that tells us another thing. The key is the Post didn't tell us anything, except that one pastor was appointed and that the quoted Mr. Rehm is a former science teacher and father of four.

That's not quite true. Powell cites the York Daily Record as reporting that in addition to the pastor, "a home-schooler who does not send his kids to public school for religious reasons, and two more who in effect pledged to support the board" were selected. What Hewitt should have done was call Powell for concluding that one of the latter two specifically stated she had not formed an opinion about the motion.

It just doesn't help when the fisking is as shoddy as the article being fisked. Hewitt does not mention that Powell gives a fair overview of opinions on evolutionary biology and intelligent design theories. Would it be a fair article if no opinion conflicting with Hewitt's is presented?

Public discourse is not enriched by the rather lackadaisical reporting of Michael Powell on the Dover school board/ACLU suit, but it is not harmed by that nearly so much as Hugh Hewitt would have his readers believe. In fact, the indignant, but equally biased and perhaps less factual rebuttal by Hewitt - especially when combined with his 10 point inquisition - is much more chilling to an open and honest debate.

Thursday, December 23, 2004

Twas The Night Before Christmas
(Blog 2004 version by Carnivorous Conservative)

Wednesday, December 22, 2004

Let It Snow!
redneck snowplow

Friday, December 17, 2004

Must... Read... sisu

One of my "here's an interesting link posts" lacking in analysis and deep thought got linked to by sisu. The analysis and thought are here: Dignity and pride need not apply; and here: Fear societies, heavy and lite. Go there.

Walter Mitty and the Seventh Dwarf go to the Fate Bookstore

by Stewart Wood

Normally Wally loved the bookstore. The anonymity, the tilted averted eyes scanning up to down, the polite side stepping dance of culture and concentration, the photography books, the swimsuit calendars. 

But today there could be little browsing, no leafing through the new Ludlums and LeCarres to find out just what sort of reluctant hero will be nailing both the Russians and the girl spies this year, no checking to see if there is an old Louis L’Amour that he forgotten enough about to wonder just how the rangy drifter saves the ranch, shoots the lawyer, whips the foreman, find the gold, and marries the marm. Wally always regrets the moral losses reflected in the new sleaze adult westerns where the mountees have nothing to do with horses or Nelson Eddy. 

There is no time for the patriotic surge of the WWII section or the wistfulness for the 19th century and back nor the sneer or snarl at the latest felonious or notorious ghostwritten anecdote collection. No! Today is mission time, assertion time, goal-oriented, problem-solving, therapy-related, tax-deductible time. Self-Help Section time.

Wally hates the self-help section. Hates realizing that he’s actually suffering from or at least in danger of every one of those goddam maladies and stigmas, that these smug-ass, all-knowing authors, degreed, royaltied, and stultifying, have figured out a solution to. Every time he ventures toward those dreaded shelves, he sees, at the corner of his clouded vision, the helpful salesperson, inevitably the tall blond one, voluptuous, eager but intelligent blue eyes, moving cheerfully but ominously his way. He always panics, grabs a book, any book, and opens it blindly but with intense concentration. It works. She pauses, smiles, furrows her brows quizzically, and changes direction. Only then he realizes he’s reading something like Acne and You or The Joy of Voyeurism. 

But not today. Today there is purpose. His shrink, discerning but unsubtle, has ordered Wally to buy a book on Shyness, in a public store, probably from a blond. If he uses a credit card, he’ll even have to remember his phone number in the midst of the crisis. 

There is really only one decent way to handle a self-help book purchase, but it’s expensive and involves deceit. A guy can’t just walk in and buy the book he wants because that means he’s at least worried and probably sick. He has to buy at least two or more unrelated but carefully selected volumes so he can pretend that these topics are but a small part of his master’s thesis research. He can’t just walk up to the counter with Dealing with Baldness, Male Menopause, and Ingrown Toenails No More. But he can if he wears a stethoscope and picks up the new P.D.R. on the way. A more honest person could simply throw in a Writer’s Market 1993, The Elements of Style, and Writing for the Self-Help Market. 

And in a rush, the random selection method works almost as well, and that’s all he has time for today. Hoping that this works out a hell of a lot better than when Dr. Hartley told Mr. Heard to be assertive, Wally finds that Shyness tome, just as his nerves are starting to jangle, and before anyone threatens him with assistance. His palms begin to sweat, his breath shortens, baitens. The great Bashful Attack is only moments away. Christ! Wait! There’s a guy handling the check-out counter right now. Maybe he can take the money. Picking up two more academic looking volumes on his way, Wally stumbles to the cash register just as the blond returns to take over. He tries to smile but the sweat is stinging his eyes. He tries for serious and dignified, but drops his wallet as he plops the books in front of the pale lovely terrifying vision who is –Oh God!—She’s talking to him and smiling as he gives her the Texaco instead of the Gold Amex he keeps just such occasions. She keep on talking and smiling and twinkling and making weather chat and wanting to be sure that’s all, and putting in bookmarks with the store’s logo with delicate naked un-diamonded fingers and writing his phone number on the charge slip and her name on his copy and telling him to hurry and come back and the whole unbearable thing nearly kills him. 

Fumbling his way through the mall to the parking lot, he lumbers into a trash can next to a bench, where he sits to steady those little neurotransmitters that are screeching across his synapses. Jesus! That was close. What was wrong with her? That silly smile of hers; that knowing look with the little downcast pouting eyes; trying to be friendly; giggling about the Texaco car; humming her little siren song. Thanks a lot, Doc. You send your acrophobes to window washing school? She probably chortling with her cohorts about him right now. That the way the are when they know they’re cute and bouncy. 

He has a cigarette to quiet his nerves, but it doesn’t work. Just like the goddam stress book he had to buy last week said it doesn’t. But he is resilient, and recovers some outward calm. Taking the Shyness book out of the sack, he realizes that what has just happened and what it is all about. The was right. Shyness was a monumental life obstacle, but really only an unnecessary by-product of his own warped imagination and self-absorbed fantasies. There is a lump in the book. Opening it, Wally finds the pen belonging to the store that he had signed with. A chance. An opportunity to calmly return to the store and the blond with the pen, apologize gracefully, establish eye contact, be civil and witty with the essentially innocent but over-solicitous hired help. Charm her socks off. 

Glancing around toward the entrance, he is struck with horror. She’s there. Coming out of the mall entrance, looking around, looking at him, waving. Holy Shit! It’s just a lousy pen. I don’t want the damned thing. 

“Oh, hi, Mr. Cox, I was hoping I could catch you.” Catch me? Jesus! I was going to bring it back. What do they do if you steal a book, for chrissakes? 

“Yes, uh, here,” he says, extending the pen, “I, uh, just found out, er, just realized that I had it.” 

She ignores the pen and clears her throat. Something is different. She seems a little nervous. 

“I, ah, forgot to give you your discount card for next time, where you get off—you get 10% off—on your next purchase.” 

He nods thanks and takes the coupon, but she goes on, determinedly. 

“And I also want to tell you, because you’re such a good customer, and you come, ah , here a lot, that we’re having a wine and cheese and autographing in the store later tonight with two contra-gate parolees and that you should come. At six, if you want.” She smiles, knowingly again, but this time it doesn’t seem so malicious, and then she turns and leaves him. 

After a while his amazement begins to subside and his mouth starts to close, and unfamiliar feelings of confidence and triumph well over him. Boldly, he dumps the Shyness book in the trash can along with the two others he hasn’t ever looked at. He smiles. He grins. He breathes deeply and slowly. He would never be Shy again. He would kiss his shrink’s feet. He might pay the bill. He would live in love and sweetness and voluable gregariousness forever. Pocketa, Pocketa. 

Later that same evening, as the delightfully loquacious Wally and the now demure blond lingered, longingly, over brandy and coffee, Mr. Ralph Carson and his wife, Edith, were making their customary aluminum can run through the mall garbage. Mr. Carson, a retired Greyhound driver, and Edith, a no-nonsense, but warm-hearted LPH, who still volunteered at the neo-natal unit when she could, didn’t really need the meager harvest of the cans, but it gave them adventures and surprises to share and beat sitting around the T.V. set. When Ralph found the new discarded books, he brought them immediately to the more widely-read Mrs. Carson, who looked at the titles and was unimpressed. Tossing the books back in the receptacle, sh told her husband, with a smile, “Forget it, Ralph. After all those passenger-miles and all those new parents, we certainly aren’t shy. We’re also never gonna have a Porsche to maintain, and we sure as heck already know how to cope with priapism.” 

Ralph, who didn’t know exactly what she was talking or smiling about, but who could read the look in her eyes like it was the Interstate through Waco, didn’t object when she took his hand and led him slowly back toward their ’81 Plymouth on the edge of the deserted lot.

Good News, Bad News

Stuart Benjamin at The Volokh Conspiracy points to a new report - Firearms and Violence: A Critical Review - that finds no causal relationship between right-to-carry laws and crime rates (either decrease or increase). This doesn't come as a surprise to me. I have long been of the opinion that guns, their availability, lack thereof, or design, have little or no impact on crime. Of course, there's as little data to back up my opinion as there apparently is for Lott's in More Guns Less Crime .

I find Mr. Benjamin's conclusion - "If more guns produces net benefits to society, then let's have more guns; if it doesn't, then let's not." - a bit incomplete and confusing. Then let's not what? Have more guns? Have fewer guns? Have no more right-to-carry laws?

Anyway, I'm saddened by another exposure of shoddy research, no matter what the field or who the researcher. And it should be noted here that the committee of researchers involved in this report weren't in complete agreement, but the honesty of publishing that disagreement (see Appendix A and Appendix B) is encouraging.

More good news is posted by Eugene Volokh:

The Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel has taken the view that "[t]he Second Amendment secures a right of individuals generally, not a right of States or a right restricted to persons serving in militias." The document is dated Aug. 24, 2004, but it has apparently just been put on the Web site very recently. The opinion is long and detailed, and I suspect will be quite influential -- OLC opinions tend to be. I also hope it gets some media attention: Certainly this sort of reasoned opinion by the Justice Department office charged with opining on such questions ought to be pretty newsworthy.

I hope he's not holding his breath.

I don't quite believe this

Do you? (via Drudge)

North Korea Says U.S. Flew 2,100 Spy Flights Over Its Territory This Year

Wednesday, December 15, 2004

Funny or Sad?

Media Research Center has released The Best of Notable Quotables 2004. Oh yeah, I laughed, especially at the category titles.
(via Youngpundit)

Tuesday, December 14, 2004

Right in my own yard, sorta.

Check out Baldilocks' Linkage - the fifth one down about a cool exchange between a civilian Beechcraft Baron pilot and a B-52 pilot. For you poor unfortunate souls who don't live near an Air Force base where these awesome aircraft are stationed, photos will have to suffice. But no photo I've ever seen online does the BUFF justice.

Our house sits under the approach to Shreveport Regional Airport. Before the Airport Authority forced us into allowing them to 'soundproof' our house (that's another blog post for another day) we would occasionally have to ask someone on the phone to repeat something. That was about as bad as the noise got, except when Air Force KC-135s occasionally used the approach for training - auditory proof that noise abatement procedures work very well.

Only once since I've lived here have Barksdale's B-52s flown over the house. That was when they returned from Desert Storm and 'buzzed' the city. If I'd known they were going to do that, I would have been out in the front yard waiting for them.

Let me tell you... you ain't been buzzed till you been buzzed by a B-52! It felt good to remember what the announcer at an airshow once said: if you can see and hear a B-52, you're not their target.

Two photos fell off the wall, the glass cracking in one of them. The windows shook in their frames and it seemed likely to me that one might shatter, a small admission price to pay to see the wings wiggle on that occasion!

Ten years later, the most awful thing about living here was the silence. On September 16, 2001 it had been five days since I'd heard what had always been the reassuringly normal sound of an airplane approaching a normal scheduled landing. Schedules are mundane predictable things we depend on. Schedules are good. Even schedules that change are good as long as it's a regularly scheduled schedule change.

That day, when I heard unfamiliar airplane noise, I ran outside anxious to see what was landing. I saw nothing at first. No plane was on approach. Then I saw them, high and in a part of the sky where regularly scheduled planes don't belong doing maneuvers regularly scheduled planes can't. They were T-38s, I think. Unarmed training aircraft - certainly not the most frightening aircraft I'd ever seen, yet their presence scared the hell out of me. An unscheduled flight.

Like most of the rest of America, I'd been in shock for five days. It took the sight of these planes after 5 days of eerie silence in the sky and endlessly tearful hours in front of the television, to make me admit to myself that the world's schedules were being torn up and discarded, not merely changed.

Though regularly scheduled flights approach their landing over our house again, I no longer take them for granted. I know how tentative schedules are now. I now know how easily they can be disrupted and I know how little I appreciated the significance of the wiggling wings of a B-52 so many years before.

 

Oil Changes Differ For Law Profs, Rednecks

I wish my doctor's office had as nice a waiting area as Zimbrick in Madison WI. Perhaps I wouldn't dread dread waiting for my turn there quite so much. So much for my thinking how lucky I was the magazine collection there was recent... meaning most are less than three years old.

I am lucky when it comes to the internet connection where I get the oil changed in my car. It's located in a comfortable and familiar place, arranged exactly to my tastes. Yep, it's right here in my little home office. You see, I live on a street that could be a shade tree mechanic's paradise. (Shade tree mechanic's heaven is my father's backyard... huge two bay garage and toys ranging from engine hoist to sawmill to tools with a purpose that will always be a mystery to me. Family get-togethers almost always involve vehicle repairs.)

Believe me, there's not a chance I'd be blogging from the place where I go for car service when the problem can't wait for the next family get-together and my personal mechanic is working out of town. The electrical contortions these guys went through to hook up the coffee pot, popcorn machine, and TV have me convinced an internet connection for customers won't be happening there anytime soon.

Monday, December 13, 2004

The Grandson
Say hello to Aidan!
What can I say? We're so proud!
The Entertainment Curmudgeon visits "The Village"

The Entertainment Curmudgeon has been on a long sabbatical during which all curmudgeonly inspiration has by necessity been directed at family members, but a family outing this week conveniently provides the occasion to refocus on the world of so-called "entertainment."

Having the film The Village inflicted on me at this very moment through a relative's choice of  pay TV in a hotel in Chicago, I am wondering, who writes these scripts?

1) First, an entire town full of white males and no guns?  Why don't they stop all the blah blah blah about the monsters in the woods and just find some way to get armed?

2) (alternative to 1)  If the monsters keep sending messages that the townfolk are not welcome there, why don't they just move their damn town somewhere more hospitable and stop all the blah blah blah?

3)  No, Virginia, coyotes do not kill domestic animals and household pets by skinning them and leaving the corpses behind. Only monsters do that.

4) How is it that the evil Roman Emperor from "Gladiator" is supposed to be convincing as a ....well, never mind, that part's over already, his village idiot friend just stuck him with a knife in some sort of  Hollywood expression of homoerotic conflict.

5) Why can't the current crop of Hollywood actors do a convincing job impersonating 19th century people?

6) Oops, the Roman Emperor is still not dead ... "Come on, after he got stabbed in the gut, he couldn't have beat the idiot off?  You get stabbed in the gut, you can still fight..." opines the same relative who picked the movie.

7)  Now the Emperor's blind-yet-all-seeing girlfriend is smeared with his blood, after beating  on the idiot, so that the monsters who are attracted to the color red are bound to eat her. She'll be dead when he wakes up from his blood-loss-induced coma, perhaps.

Well, who knows, maybe it will have a more upbeat ending.  And as bad as it is, at least none of the world's most irritating actors  (Matthew McConaughey, Mel Gibson, Julia Roberts) are stars.... it seems that an almost unrecognizable (except for the voice) William Hurt has a major role (and he can actually act!),  but I'm afraid Sigourney Weaver looks age-appropriate for  a post-menopausal woman living in the middle of nowhere in the 19th century. .

Wait ... wait ... now it seems to be turning into some sort of mass grief counseling thing instead of a horror movie.  And now there's the blind woman hysterically running around the woods,  just fell into a sinkhole, climbed out, lost, muddy, surrounded by the red flowers that draw the monsters that William Hurt just said were non-existent, except there they are trying to grab her ...

Somebody was doing some serious drugs when he wrote this one (the director, apparently).  If this is supposed to be some sort of fable about humanity and its own dark side, try again without imitating "The Blair Witch Project."

Two thumbs down and 8 fingers and 10 toes ... this director needs to apologize to the public for still being alive, IMHO.  The Village made me seriously consider paying ten bucks to watch Troy again as an immediate emotionally corrective experience, and we all know how great that one was ...

Posted for the Entertainment Curmudgeon by DB.

Sunday, December 12, 2004

Read Free

Instapundit says reviews of Michael Crichton's State of Fear vaguely reminds him of Fallen Angels and points out the latter book is available for free download (multiple formats) from the Baen Free Library.

I found the reasoning behind the idea of offering the books for free as a method of combating piracy very interesting:

3. Any cure which relies on tighter regulation of the market — especially the kind of extreme measures being advocated by some people — is far worse than the disease. As a widespread phenomenon rather than a nuisance, piracy occurs when artificial restrictions in the market jack up prices beyond what people think are reasonable. The "regulation-enforcement-more regulation" strategy is a bottomless pit which continually recreates (on a larger scale) the problem it supposedly solves. And that commercial effect is often compounded by the more general damage done to social and political freedom.

You'll get the whole story by following the link to the library. There are over 70 books available for download.

 

Friday, December 10, 2004

Real World Intrudes...

Blogging disrupted. Be back on Monday!

Thursday, December 9, 2004

"We Own It"

MoveOn.org: "Now it's our Party: we bought it, we own it, and we're going to take it back."

That's right. You break it, you own it.

Separation of Religion and State

From the New York Times:

CAIRO, Dec. 9 - Muhammad Shahrour, a layman who writes extensively about Islam, sits in his engineering office in Damascus, Syria, arguing that Muslims will untangle their faith from the increasingly gory violence committed in its name only by reappraising their sacred texts.

First, Mr. Shahrour brazenly tackles the Koran. The entire ninth chapter, The Sura of Repentance, he says, describes a failed attempt by the Prophet Muhammad to form a state on the Arabian Peninsula. He believes that as the source of most of the verses used to validate extremist attacks, with lines like "slay the pagans where you find them," the chapter should be isolated to its original context.

"The state which he built died, but his message is still alive," says Mr. Shahrour, a soft-spoken, 65-year-old Syrian civil engineer with thinning gray hair. "So we have to differentiate between the religion and state politics. When you take the political Islam, you see only killing, assassination, poisoning, intrigue, conspiracy and civil war, but Islam as a message is very human, sensible and just."

These are the real revolutionaries, the real insurgents, in the Middle East. They are more courageous by any measure than terrorists who hide behind the clerics who interpret the verses to justify murder. Go read the whole thing now before it goes to the archive$.

Wednesday, December 8, 2004

Bush, Bushed, and Bushisms

Eugene Volokh has been bashing the Bushism of the Day feature at Slate. And he's been criticized for doing so:

Incidentally, people occasionally fault my criticisms of the Bushisms. "They're just a joke," they say. Well, they are attempts at humor — but they are attempts at humor that criticizes Bush. (See the Introduction to the Bushisms book, excerpted here.) If you're going to criticize someone, it seems to me that you should do it fairly and aptly. Many of the Bushisms strike me as unfair and inapt, which is why I comment on them.

I was reminded of this post when I ran across this entry in Loose Cannons, Red Herrings, and Other Lost Metaphors :

bush(ed). In America, "bush" once meant forest or wilderness, as it still does in Australia and New Zealand. If you got lost in that sort of country, you were 'bushed" -- and by the time you found your way home, would be thoroughly bushed (exhausted). The "bush" gets another twist in the "bush leagues," composed of semi-pro baseball teams from small towns out in the bush. A bush-league performance is inept, and to "bush" someone is to talk foolishly ("Don't bush me!"--George V. Higgins).

Will Mr. Volokh get bushed bashing Slate for bushing Bush for his bush-league Bushisms?

Is it clear yet? Freedom is about having choices.

Another example from The Shape of Days:

Some Muslim women — maybe even many; I certainly don't know firsthand — object to liberalization because they think we want to take their burqas and their scarves away from them. This isn't the case. (Well, to be fair, I'm sure there are some people out there who want Muslim women to stop following hijab, but their views aren't typical, I don't think.) What we want is for women in Iraq and the Dar-al-Islam and the whole world to be able to choose for themselves. If they choose not to follow hijab, we want them to be safe, not psychologically abused or beaten black and blue or imprisoned or murdered.

I have probably not made my political ideology clear on this blog, other than pointing out multiple reasons not to vote for Kerry. I'm mostly a libertarian, leaning right on economic issues and leaning left on social issues. The deciding factor on almost all issues is how much choice the options leave for individuals.

Blogging the Depths of Bizarre

Virtually anything can be virtual now. Carnivorous Conservative asks How Deep is Beauty?

How Deep is Being Canadian? --Ace of Spades

Men will be Men - Althouse. Mort Kuntsler's talent was deeper than I thought.

Hoo Boy - INDC Journal - this reporter may get the bends on his way back to journalistic ethics.

CBS, still digging - LGF - At least they're not digging alone - Wizbang

SondraK explores new depths of Interior Design. I'm flattered she chose to imitate my style.

Army of Mom plumbs the depths of sophomoric stereotyping of sores.

Tuesday, December 7, 2004

Great Balls of Fire!

via Drudge

Bonfire of the Vanities - Week 75

The Bonfire is hosted by artitumis.com this week. I forgot to submit an entry, but sort of ended up with one anyway! I love it when a plan comes together.

Letters to the Troops

I have been remiss in not promoting SlagleRock's Letter Project before this. I have no excuse. I read about it at My Vast Rightwing Conspiracy several days ago.

Merry Christmas from Tornado Country
redneck gingerbread house
I can't wait to see the after tornado photo!

Monday, December 6, 2004

Endorsements

I am quite sure the entire blogosphere has been holding its breath waiting to find out who Pajama Pundits is officially endorsing in The 2004 Weblog Awards. The responsibility that comes with the power to influence two, perhaps three votes is not to be taken lightly, thus much research and in-depth study of the finalists in the following categories has been painstakingly conducted.

In fact, I have strived for the level of integrity in this endeavor exhibited by my sons-in-law in choosing beer. Do not take that lightly folks - their research is scientifically designed, carefully documented, and... ongoing.

However, since the voting ends in five days, I must publish my findings now. The overwhelming lesson learned is that there's some damned fine bloggers running amok with wit, style, culture, philosophy, political analysis, digital cameras, and Photoshop.

The anticipation now comes to an end. You may now breathe normally:

Best Overall Blog - Powerline - because I said so. (I'm a mother (and a grandmother!), thus 'because' is sufficient reason alone and it applies to all the following choices too, even when I cite further reasons! So there.)
Best New Blog - INDC Journal -  for excellence in Moonbat research or My Vast Right Wing Conspiracy for excellence in style.
Best Group Blog - The Volokh Conspiracy - for legal possession of humor and intelligence.
Best Humor Blog - IMAO - for extraordinary penmanship and willingness to accept bribes.
Best Liberal Blog - Mayflower Hill
Best Conservative Blog - Althouse - because she's a common-sense moderate.
Best Culture Blog - Knowledge Is Power: SondraK - because, um... Knowledge is Power.
Best Military Blog - Blackfive

Best of the Top 100 Blogs - The Politburo Diktat - because I want on his Christmas gift list.
Best of the Top 100-250 Blogs - Patterico - the eyes, the smile... oh, and creative bribery.
Best of the Top 250-500 Blogs - JustOneMinute now, how fast do you think my Speed of Thought is? (I refuse to decide, vote for one on even-numbered days, the other on odd-numbered days.)
Best of the Top 1000-1750 Blogs - ha! No recommendation here, I'm not well-armed enough to fight in that battle!
Best of the Top 1750-2500 Blogs - The Shape of Days because now I don't actually have to watch Survivor.
UPDATED INSERTION: Best of the Top 2500-3500 Blogs - YoungPundit - geez, how could I forget the youngster! Let's attribute it to me being an oldster.
Best of the Top 3500-5000 Blogs - Pajama Pundits for excellence in endorsements! After you vote for us, be sure to read Army of Mom, Prochein Amy, Geek Empire, Chapomatic, Mixolydian Mode, The Cassandra Page, and Dr. Charles.
Best of the Rest of the Blogs - artitumis - because he said my 'home-sewn' pajama banner didn't suck a whole lot.

Ethical Blogging

Jay Tea at Wizbang is kicking around the idea of starting a Blogger's Code of Ethics. While I think it's a good idea in general, I'm not sure I can live up to his suggested standards all the time. Honesty, accuracy and responsibility are basic. No problem there. I would even commit to putting forth my best effort. But interesting? I'm not about to make a promise I will surely break someday.

My uninteresting self is irrelevant to the issue. There are enough detailed elements of the basics for sustained squabbles...er, I mean lengthy discussions. Deciding on a standard for best effort could be next to impossible; one for what is interesting will be beyond impossible.

UPDATE: Jeff Blogworthy (great name!) notes in the comments that Rebecca Blood has written Weblog Ethics.   

Call Me Grandma!
Our first grandchild - an 8 lb. 6 oz. beautiful, healthy boy - was born yesterday evening at 6:25 pm PST. I'm hovering over the inbox awaiting photos. Patiently, of course. If the new parents don't mind, I'll post them here.

"December 7, 1941 -- a date which will live in infamy"

As commander in chief of the Army and Navy, I have directed that all measures be taken for our defense. But always will our whole nation remember the character of the onslaught against us.

No matter how long it may take us to overcome this premeditated invasion, the American people in their righteous might will win through to absolute victory. -- FDR

Usar

"Freedom Is An Unremitting Endeavor"

Karzai Sworn In as Afghan President

Democracy is always a beckoning goal, not a safe harbor. For freedom is an unremitting endeavor, never a final achievement. --  Felix Frankfurter

Pecan Pralines

Exquisitely rich.

1 cup granulated sugar
1 cup brown sugar (dark or light, depending on your taste)
1 cup light cream (half & half)
1 cup pecans
2 tablespoons butter
In a 2 qt. heavy saucepan, combine sugars and cream. Bring to boiling over medium heat, stirring occasionally until the candy thermometer reads 228 degrees. Add pecans and butter, continue cooking over medium heat until thermometer reads 235 degrees, or until it is dropped in cold water, it forms a soft ball.  Remove pan from heat and allow to cool to 200 degrees, or 10-20 minutes, stirring occasionally with a spoon. When thick enough (but still glossy) drop by rounded  tablespoons onto buttered waxed paper. Makes approximately 1 dozen.

If you don't have a candy thermometer, read The Cold Water Candy Test for details on how to tell when the mixture is at the soft ball stage.

Sunday, December 5, 2004

Alliances and Conspiracies

Oh yeah, do it!
UPDATE: Go here.

Lunnaya Letuchaya Meesh

If you want to know what that means, go read E-mail of the Day, including the comments. Way to Go, Bill!

A Success Story

The 2004 Weblog Awards are a success, despite the actions of some cyberidiots. Since the voting began, Pajama Pundits has soared in the Ecosystem to the status of Flappy Bird (3247) from Crawly Amphibian. Thanks, Kevin!

UPDATE: Looks like I've slithered back down to Slithering Reptile. That's still a success!

Saturday, December 4, 2004

Just My Size

My size? 70 carats! Oh yeah...but it's not my style. Darn. I really wish I was on sisu's Christmas list. Her taste in gifts is exquisite.

Fortunately, considering where he's shopping, I'm not on the Commissar's list either... well, not the gift list, anyway.

"The forces of guilt and shame join in an unholy alliance"

Imagine you are in an English class. Imagine your assignment is to write a cohesive essay including homosexuality in Japan, shame, outing gay Republicans, oiled geese, the Old South, guilt, racism, and civil rights.

Imagine you could do it this well: Spreading Troubled Oil on Troubled Waters...

Thanks, Daily Kos!

I'm still going to have fun watching Pajama Pundits lose in the 2004 Weblog Awards. Believe it or not, losing honestly is a lot more fun than winning dishonestly. It's not that I'm such a Pollyanna - I encouraged friends to vote as often as they could, at work and at home, on each computer they owned, but that is within the rules, is it not?

But I'd have never thought of using a script for automated voting. I didn't even think of clearing my browser cookies to vote for myself twice. I feel sort of techno-dumb. Of course on-line polls are meaningless for important issues, but I thought this one was for fun and to increase traffic to blogs. It's not like there is a big cash prize or Hawaiian vacation for two as Grand Prize.

As a Wizbang commenter puts it: So, Kevin didn't lock his doors.  This justifies burglary?

The initial post at Daily Kos simply called for readers to go vote.

I know we have the numbers.  Please don't let those guys sweep the category -- let's win this thing and get some increased exposure, traffic and ad revenue for Kos.

Perfectly fine. Look at the numbers in the The Truth Laid Bear Ecosystem - why would they need to cheat? A look at the comments reveals that some Kos readers think that because Wizbang is a "right-wing fanatic", they shouldn't participate. Others, obviously, thought the best way to "show us" how smart they were was to ruin the contest. In that thread, only one person (that I found) condemned the cheating.

UPDATE: Five people now condemning cheating on the KOS thread. I suppose the multiple posts by those five add up to the dozen regulars mentioned here. Oh, do check out the identity of one of those 'regulars' for a little giggle.

UPDATE: Carnivorous Conservative wonders about the KOS numbers.

Other bloggers commenting on this:

artitumis - I find it very amusing that the group of people claiming the 2004 election was rigged are the same people rigging these awards. They make me completely sick. UPDATE - comments on the comments

Youngpundit - Conclusion: Democrats will say and do anything to win, from Elections to Webpolls.

Power Line -
Is this a big deal? No, but that's sort of the point. The liberals' instinct to cheat is so strong that they can't even participate in a fun little contest without trying to spoil it for everyone else. That's sad, but, as I said, it's also typical.

This isn't writing, it's typing - Well, you knew it had to happen.

The House of Wheels - The hypocrisy of the non-moderate left is one of the most obvious explanations as to why they have spent so long in the political wilderness in free, democratic, capitalist countries.

Captain's Quarters - It's the equivalent of bringing a marked deck to a poker game with matchsticks for stakes.

Eternity Road - Your Curmudgeon was tempted to say “boys will be boys,” but as his fingers landed on the keys, it occurred to him that the behavior described here is beneath the standards of even a healthy preadolescent.

UPDATE: Another Kossack conspiracy revealed? The Politburo Diktat - Why do we have purple M&M's? Guess.

And another UPDATE: The Shape of Days - I'd love to win a Webbie. I think it'd be really neat. But if I find out that anybody has cheated on my behalf, I'll drop out of the race immediately and publicly, and I swear to God I'll plaster the cheater's name all off the blogosphere in the process.

P.S. Go vote for Pajama Pundits!!

Friday, December 3, 2004

Outblogged Again

I was going to trash Frank Rich's latest dropping in today's NYT - The Nascar Nightly News: Anchorman Get Your Gun - but fortunately I read Ace first. (Always a Good Idea.) There I found Garfield Ridge, where Dave has trashed it so much better than I could have in I Disagree With Everything Frank Rich Writes, Including His Prepositions.

Am I going to have to start getting up earlier, or what? (That's a rhetorical question. My offspring, especially, need not reply.)

While I was going to write that Frank Rich is a petty, muddle-headed, partisan hack, Dave writes:

Rich makes the argument that the succession of Brian Williams to the anchor chair of the NBC Nightly News is an attempt to pander to red state voters.

Now, given how the only pandering Brian Williams ever seems to conduct is directed towards folks Rich could comfortably call ideological allies, that charge is curious at best.

While getting your thesis paragraph wrong is usually a good sign to quit writing while you're ahead, Rich continues, expanding his criticism of NBC’s mythical pandering to include any such attempt, by just about anyone in the media, at ever looking at the news without blue state blinders on. Blinders that Rich assumes are, of course, the natural and just state of affairs in the national media.

How dare NBC executives talk about appealing to "Nascar dads," and "moral values.” What gall NBC displays, undertaking even this feeble attempt at outreach to the part of America Frank Rich so strongly disdains.

And that's just the warm-up. It gets better. Go read it.

It's a Condiment Problem

What a headline - Soiled Rotten. Read Denis Boyles' EuroPress Review. It's enlightening, it's sickening, it's... mostly depressing. A sampling:

If for example the papers had been forgeries and if they had been about, say, George W. Bush, a network like, say, CBS, would have trumpeted in prime time, maybe even teaming up with a newspaper, like, say, the New York Times, to further corrupt journalism and ambush a presidential election. But the documents containing Galloway's name were not forgeries (they were, said the Telegraph's executive editor, "genuine documents that emanated from the highest levels of the Iraqi government"), so the paper not surprisingly rushed into print with its discovery. Galloway sued. Yesterday, accordingTelegraph, a British court found that Galloway had been libeled when the paper "not merely adopted" the allegations in the documents but had "embraced them with relish and fervour." In other words, the problem was the condiments, not the weenie — who by the way was awarded about $290 grand.

I complain a lot about our press and about court decisions and I'm not that fond of the direction toward lesser freedom of choice the country seems to headed in, so let us be wary and vigilant and careful. I don't think a U.S. court would have reached the same decision, but I'm not completely sure. No matter how bad our press gets, it is still free.

Thanks to Roger L. Simon for bringing the article to my attention.

 
The Price of Oil in China

When the 'skyrocketing' price of oil began appearing in scary headlines just before the election, I wondered why the sudden increase. It didn't make sense to me that the price spiked at that particular time with no apparent reason, except the election.

I emailed a friend in the oil 'bidness' and asked him what was going on. He said the driving force behind the steady increase in oil prices was increasing demand in China. Over a period of time, that makes sense, but it didn't seem to account for the pre-election spike.

Power Line's Hindrocket is suspicious too, and asks if anyone in the mainstream media is investigating. Roger L. Simon challenges the blogosphere to investigate the mysterious price of oil also, and the result of that request in his comments is an mini-education on the issue. He's blessed with a seriously knowledgeable group of commenters.

UPDATE: More on the Price of Oil from Power Line, where they've also got brilliant readers.

Headed in the Right Direction

Let public defend itself from criminals: top British police chief

People should be able to use whatever force is necessary to defend their homes, Britain's most senior police officer said in an interview.

A fatal stabbing of a financier in a chic part of London led to this sentiment from Sir John Stevens, the outgoing commissioner of London's Metropolitan Police.

"Of course you don't want to have gratuitous or excessive violence... I'm not talking about guns, but people being allowed to defend themselves ... against someone who may well be armed with a knife," he said.

Guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens does not lead to gratuitous or excessive violence. Disarming the law-abiding and punishing them for defending themselves, however, does.

(via Drudge)

Thursday, December 2, 2004

Freedom to choose

My friend, Michael, posts about how grateful he is to have the freedom to choose where to live within the vast landscape the United States represents. Something tells me he doesn't enjoy the wet and cold some of our states have to offer this time of year.

Choices are what freedom is all about, isn't it?

Too much D*n R*ather here?

All four of the Google Ads are for D*n R*ther related sites. I'm declaring this a D*n R*ather free blog for... at least 2 days.

Carnival of the Recipes #16 is up!

Fresh as a Daisy is hosting this week. Some of the recipes sound fascinating, like the one for Pilgrim on the Beach - "It sounds like drinking a pumpkin pie, with a little alcohol for some kick."

The recipes are arranged so that the reader can conveniently plan an entire meal, from appetizers to dessert. That is, if you're still hungry after a few Pilgrims ;-)

Bringing Out the Best... and the Worst

Wizbang's 2004 Weblog Awards bring out the best in some:

Carnivorous Conservative - The Ugly Underside of Wizbang's 2004 Weblog Awards
Geek Empire - my pajamas have a pocket protector
Aaron's Rantblog - Moxie's Boots Are Made For Walking
Jim Treacher - Things That Might Make People Vote for him
Ann Althouse - "This will do wonders for my reputation in Madison, Wisconsin" (LOL!!)
Jane Galt - Vote early and often
Cold Fury - "...and I actually voted for that ingrate Goldstein" (haha!!)
IMAO - "...and I want a meaningless award!" (me too)
Mamamontezz - Legal Challenge to Wizbang 2004 Blog Awards
My Vast Right Wing Conspiracy - Now, for something completely different...
SondraK - early and often
Prochein Amy - Dear Abby...
Flying Space Monkey - something

The best part of this for me is that through the voting polls, I've read blogs I would probably never have stumbled upon before, particularly some of those in the Best Essayist, Technical, and Ecosystem categories. My horizons have been broadened (though they've still got a ways to go to catch up with me butt - or Hillary's)

And the worst less than the best in others:

A Small Victory - Clarification and Whatnot (but no longer offended, apparently
The Worldwide Rant - Elected, Selected, Whatever
Right Thoughts - Yup

Lighten up... have some fun.

C

I must get a cat

I would like to remind all Pajama Pundits readers and those stopping by to check out the flannel, that SemiOnager has a cat, one of my daughters has a cat, the other one would like to have a cat, and I used to have a cat a long time ago.

Making Fools of the Censors

Boing Boing's Xeni Jardin reveals censorship foolishness of Microsoft's new MSN Spaces blogging tool by demonstrating that Butt Sex is Awesome (a phrase I never expected to see on Instapundit) slips through the cracks but Anal Health for People who think Buttsex is Awesome fails.

I looked at the blogging tool last week, but was unimpressed. This second look hasn't changed my opinion, but being a very open-minded person, I'll check it out again... maybe.

Wednesday, December 1, 2004

Elvie's Shrimp Gumbo

This recipe was handwritten by my mother-in-law in a notebook somewhere around 30 years ago. When I first read it, I thought it wouldn't be good since it didn't involve a roux. Ha! I was so wrong! For Louisiana food, this is a mild recipe. When I make it for my family, I use more filé and add cayenne pepper.

I've also substituted peeled, frozen cocktail shrimp, chicken, or sausage, but it's best with fresh shrimp.

Enjoy!

2 tablespoons salad oil
1 cup chopped onion
1 cup chopped green pepper
½ cup chopped celery
1 clove garlic, pressed
1 bay leaf, crumbled
Salt, to taste
¼ teaspoon pepper
1 can (1 lb. 15 oz) stewed tomatos, undrained
1 can (13 ¾ oz) chicken broth
½ lb. shrimp, in the shell
1 pkg (10 oz.) frozen okra, thawed
2 teaspoon gumbo filé

3-4 cups cooked rice
chopped parsley

In hot oil, in 6 quart dutch oven, sauté onion, green pepper, celery, and garlic. Stir frequently. Add bay leaf, ½ teaspoon salt, pepper, tomatoes, and chicken broth. Mash tomatoes with fork.

Bring to a boil – stirring frequently. Cover and simmer for 30 minutes.

Cut okra into ½ inch slices. Add to tomato mixture. Simmer, covered 15 minutes.

Shell and de-vein shrimp. Cut in half lengthwise. Add to mixture, simmer covered for 3 minutes.

Stir in filé.

Serve over rice, sprinkle with parsley.

2004 Weblog Awards Poll will be up soon

When they are final, you can find them here. Should Pajama Pundits make the final cut (please! please!) be assured I'll provide you with a link to VOTE EARLY, VOTE OFTEN!

Vote for Pajama Pundits!

Should we win, the Pajama Pundits ticket promises free beer for the world, 24/7 sports and Trading Spaces, unlimited access to the leftovers in the fridge, and... oh, yeah - WHIRLED PEAS!

It's so exciting - we've been doing this for just a little over two months, and... though I'm seriously distressed we're not in the Best Overall Blog category, I can live with that... as long as you VOTE FOR PAJAMA PUNDITS in Best of the Top 3500 - 5000 Blogs. Please? Pretty Please? (begging is not attractive - ed. But, is it effective?)

UPDATE: Somebody thinks plaid pants and Sex Pistols t-shirts are somehow more blogappropriate than flannels with footsies. I have just one question - where can you get a Sex Pistols t-shirt with a pocket?

On Hating America

Thank You, Mudville Gazette, for linking to Hating America, by Bruce Bawer. I was about halfway through reading this article a week or so ago, and lost it during one of Time Warner Cable's inexplicable outages. Now I can finish it.

Just to get you hooked:

Living in Europe, I gradually came to appreciate American virtues I’d always taken for granted, or even disdained—among them a lack of self-seriousness, a grasp of irony and self-deprecating humor, a friendly informality with strangers, an unashamed curiosity, an openness to new experience, an innate optimism, a willingness to think for oneself and speak one’s mind and question the accepted way of doing things. (One reason why Euro- peans view Americans as ignorant is that when we don’t know something, we’re more likely to admit it freely and ask questions.) While Americans, I saw, cherished liberty, Europeans tended to take it for granted or dismiss it as a naïve or cynical, and somehow vaguely embarrassing, American fiction. I found myself toting up words that begin with i: individuality, imagination, initiative, inventiveness, independence of mind. Americans, it seemed to me, were more likely to think for themselves and trust their own judgments, and less easily cowed by authorities or bossed around by “experts”; they believed in their own ability to make things better. No wonder so many smart, ambitious young Europeans look for inspiration to the United States, which has a dynamism their own countries lack, and which communicates the idea that life can be an adventure and that there’s important, exciting work to be done. Reagan-style “morning in America” clichés may make some of us wince, but they reflect something genuine and valuable in the American air. Europeans may or may not have more of a “sense of history” than Americans do (in fact, in a recent study comparing students’ historical knowledge, the results were pretty much a draw), but America has something else that matters—a belief in the future.

Over time, then, these things came into focus for me. Then came September 11. Briefly, Western European hostility toward the U.S. yielded to sincere, if shallow, solidarity (“We are all Americans”). But the enmity soon re-established itself (a fact confirmed for me daily on the websites of the many Western European newspapers I had begun reading online). With the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, it intensified. Yet the endlessly reiterated claim that George W. Bush “squandered” Western Europe’s post-9/11 sympathy is nonsense. The sympathy was a blip; the anti-Americanism is chronic.

Hits and Egos

I added Sitemeter around 10 pm last night, so I find the Carnivorous Conservative's Damn Lies and Statistics post very interesting. I did this mainly because Typepad's system wasn't giving me the information my ego craved. Sitemeter may end up crushing the ego entirely, but... it's a chance I'll take.

I took Typepad's total number of hits and halved it to come up with the number of visitors before joing Site Meter. I hope that's on the low side, as it was not my intention to overstate it.